To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Abilities
Immediately following pre-operating got occurred, the attention direction data try appeared to possess outliers (study issues larger than 1.five times brand new interquartile diversity for a given variable), from the exploring boxplots. The newest rural studies activities (n = 19) have been omitted to have individual study products within the eyes-record strategies , composed of 4.22% of overall studies.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, single Sports Sites dating r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig 2) (ignoring condition anxiety) and you will roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (dealing with getting county nervousness).
There can be no significant matchmaking between LSAS ratings and very first fixation duration into human body, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 which had been along with the case whenever controlling to possess condition stress having fun with a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Prevention
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations and indicated that whenever dealing with having state nervousness, there was no extreme dating between your LSAS results and dwell for you personally to your head r (25) = -.063, p = .756, the body r (27) = -.090, p = .643, plus the records r (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
An effective inverse relationship are receive between scanpath length and you may LSAS rating, roentgen (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever overlooking condition stress, and you will stayed whenever state stress is regulated for roentgen (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step 3).
A strong negative relationship are receive between total saccade amount and you will LSAS score, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 whenever disregarding state stress, and this stayed extreme an once condition stress is regulated to own roentgen (26) = -.516, p = .005. No relationship was receive anywhere between imply saccade amplitude and you can LSAS get although not, r (29) = -.176, p = .362 regardless of if state anxiety is regulated to possess roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417
